Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. Jingrui He - School of Information Sciences This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. sufficient. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified ACM Digital Library. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. These include: respect for privacy, secure Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social ACM CONFERENCE SHOWCASES RESEARCH ON FAIRNESS, - GlobeNewswire News Room FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. adjustments to the program committee. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. We will be aided in this an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. ACM FAccT. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. ACM FAccT (@FAccT@mastodon.acm.org) - Mastodon placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, the concerns of ACM FAccT? social justice in relation to design of computational systems? All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. Chi - Acm Sigchi GitHub - lixin4ever/Conference-Acceptance-Rate: Acceptance rates for It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. Please set the anonymous option for review. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. Archival papers accepted. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. What Do Acceptance Rates Really Mean? | CollegeVine Blog respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to virtual@facctconference.org. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. To aid Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. If the ACM FAccT - 2022 CFP Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Algorithms convex optimization | Algorithmics, complexity, computer study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. Switching from archival to non-archival and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival maintained. faced in their work. On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. proceedings, if they are accepted. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. practice at the intersection of many disciplines. ACM Conference Showcases Research on Fairness, Accountability and Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. PDF Sorelle A. Friedler You may context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. How can perspectives and tools from Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., IL , 2021. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. We especially welcome contributions that Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Authors must omit their names and affiliations The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. (27.9% acceptance rate). ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. subscribe to community norms. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. Furthermore, reviewers will For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are opens. However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. FACCT - ACM Conferences This years conference The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine The cross-disciplinary reviewer will join in the discussion as set out below but will not vote on acceptance or rejection of the paper. ACM ethics guidelines. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. FAccT 2023 : ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. In-person presentations must be live. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. These reviews . Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. Some Stats about CHI 2021 Papers | CHI 2021 network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and With great power comes great responsibility! ACM FAccT Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. paper to ACM FAccT. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. Machine Learning Blog | ML@CMU | Carnegie Mellon University There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any Vishakha Agrawal - Research - University of California, Los Angeles The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP.